Intellectual Property
Customs and Border Protection is responsible for preventing merchandise that infringes U.S. copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights from entering the country. Customs is also responsible for the enforcement of exclusion ordered issued by the International Trade Commission in Section 337 cases, which generally focus on the enforcement of patent rights.
Recording trademarks
Recording copyrights
Developing brand protection materials for training Customs personnel
Responding to CBP seizure notices
Seeking rulings from CBP to confirm compliance with 337 exclusion orders
Should you have questions or concerns regarding the importation or exclusion of merchandise subject to intellectual property protection, please contact a Barnes/Richardson lawyer.
Trademark Issues
Importers of branded merchandise should be aware that the law prohibits the importation of merchandise bearing a U.S. trademark without the permission of the trademark owner. Thus, importers should be prepared to show authorization from the rights holder. Absent permission, Customs can seize the infringing goods. While Customs can seize any infringing goods, its primary focus is on the interdiction of counterfeit goods. Counterfeit goods are products that bear a mark that copies or simulates a registered trademark. Because counterfeiting is illegal activity, the counterfeited products are often of inferior quality and may pose a risk to health and safety.Copyrights
Customs also has the power to exclude "piratical" copies of products covered by copyright such as books, music, videos, software, and video games. A piratical copy is one that is produced without the authorization of the copyright holder. Because products imported into the U.S. often include a copyrightable elements (e.g., written instructions, packaging artwork, etc.), copyrights may be a viable alternative to trademark enforcement for companies seeking to prevent the entry of "knock-off products."Gray Market Goods
It is often possible to find desirable products on sale outside the United States at discounted prices. This creates the possibility that goods will be imported through unauthorized channels. Such goods are called "gray market" or "parallel imports." Because these are genuine products, gray market goods are admissible provided they are not materially different from the products offered for sale in the U.S. As a result, parallel importers must be careful to recognize the differences between their imports and the products authorized for sale in the U.S. Differences such as foreign language labeling, packaging, and formulation may provide a sufficient basis for Customs to exclude the merchandise. Further, companies can seek so-called "Lever Brother Protection" from parallel imports. When granted, Lever Brother Protection requires that parallel imports be labeled as such prior to release.Recordation
Customs and Border Protection focuses its enforcement efforts on trademarks, copyrights, and trade dress recorded via its electronic system. Recordation is a relatively simple and inexpensive step that provides significant benefits. Recordation publishes the claim for protection to Customs personnel throughout the country and alerts them to the possibility that infringing merchandise is being presented for entry. Recordation should be part of a rights holder's larger strategy of working with Customs to protect its investment in intellectual property.Section 337
Determining whether a product infringes upon a U.S. patent is often requires the application of complex legal and technical knowledge. Because of the complexity of the issues, the enforcement of patent rights at the border is entrusted to the U.S. International Trade Commission, which has staff attorneys and Administrative Law Judges dedicated to reviewing claims made before the agency. If infringement is found, the ITC can order that the merchandise be excluded from the United States. It falls to Customs and Border Protection to enforce those orders.Our Role
Barnes/Richardson lawyers have assisted clients with all aspects of the border enforcement of intellectual property law including:Recording trademarks
Recording copyrights
Developing brand protection materials for training Customs personnel
Responding to CBP seizure notices
Seeking rulings from CBP to confirm compliance with 337 exclusion orders
Should you have questions or concerns regarding the importation or exclusion of merchandise subject to intellectual property protection, please contact a Barnes/Richardson lawyer.
- May 8, 2024
- The Largest-Ever Civil Penalty for "Made in USA" Violation
- May 3, 2024
- Final Rule on EV Battery Tax Credit
- May 3, 2024
- New Bill Proposes Battery Supply Chain Tracing
- Apr. 30, 2024
- Understanding Exporter Liability for Re-Exports
- Apr. 25, 2024
- Mexico Imposes Very High Duties on Some Imports
- Apr. 22, 2024
- Climate and Trade Task Force Created
- Apr. 12, 2024
- Using French and British English to Classify Imports
- Mar. 22, 2024
- End -User Restrictions for OFAC SDN Listed Entities
- Mar. 22, 2023
- DHS Gets a Budget Boost for Combating Forced Labor
- Feb. 13, 2024
- Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity Implemented
- Feb. 12, 2024
- The 2018 Trade War Has Been an Employment Failure
- Feb. 9, 2024
- New Export Control Know-Your-Customer (KYC) Requirements for IaaS Providers
- Feb. 2, 2024
- Court Clarifies What Qualifies as a "Basket Provision"
- Feb. 1, 2024
- Fine Makes Clear That the FTC is Serious About Made in USA
- Jan. 30, 2024
- Sheffield Issues Guide for the Solar or EV Battery Sectors
- Jan. 24, 2024
- Importer Avoids 7% Surprise on Agency Arrangement
- Jan. 19, 2024
- BIS's Fast-Track to Resolving Voluntary Self-Disclosure
- Jan. 16, 2024
- Drug Cartel Linked to $10.4 million Customs Fraud Penalty
- Jan. 8, 2024
- Customs Publicizes UFLPA Detention Addendum
- Dec. 19, 2023
- US and EU Appear to Have Trade Truce Through March 2025
- Dec. 19, 2023
- House Select Committee Advocates Trade Changes with China
- Dec. 14, 2023
- A U.S.-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement is Very Unlikely
- Dec. 5, 2023
- Global Arrangement On Sustainable Steel And Aluminum Negotiations Failed, Maybe
- Nov. 28, 2023
- Key Senators Push to Keep China Tariffs
- Nov. 8, 2023
- Focus on AGOA Renewal as GSP Appears to Languish
- Oct. 24, 2023
- Commerce Continues to Issue Semiconductor Restrictions in Bid to Protect Supply Chains
- Oct. 13, 2023
- Understanding the Bureau of Industry and Security's Entity List
- Oct. 11, 2023
- 49 Entities Additions to BIS for Circumvention of Integrated Circuits to Russia
- Oct. 10, 2023
- Semiconductor Rule Finalized by Commerce
- Sep 27, 2023
- U.S. Companies in China are Feeling Pessimistic and are Acting on the Feeling
- Aug. 18, 2023
- Two CIT Decisions Clarify Some (Potential) Importer Responsibilities
- Jun. 23, 2023
- SHU Publishes "Desk-Based" Forced Labor Research Strategies
- Jun. 15, 2023
- Congress Seeks Industry Input Regarding Updates Need to Modernize U.S. Customs Laws
- Apr. 20, 2023
- Seagate's $300 million Export and Foreign Direct Products Rule Violation
- Apr. 10, 2023
- UFLPA Best Business Practices
- Apr. 10, 2023
- As Exemplified by Microsoft's Sanctions and Export Controls – You can't Pass off Compliance to Third Parties
- Feb. 24, 2023
- The CHIPS Act and a Long-term Vision for America's Technological Leadership
- Nov. 29, 2022
- China PNTR Removal Recommendation
- Jul. 13, 2021
- USITC Investigating Skechers and Hobby Lobby for Importing Fake Crocs
- May 4, 2021
- Member of Congress Press for Section 301 Exclusions
- Mar. 23, 2021
- ITC Limited Exclusion Order in LG Battery Dispute Awaits Presidential Action
- January 15, 2020
- US-China Reach "Phase One" Agreement
- Dec. 10, 2019
- House Announces USMCA Agreement
- July 8, 2019
- USTR Issues More Section 301 Exclusions
- May 30, 2019
- Revisiting First Sale as a Basis for Declaring Customs Value as a Strategy to Reduce Duty Obligations under Section 301
- February 25, 2019
- President Trump Delays Deadline for 301 Tariff Increase
- October 2, 2018
- USTR Releases Fact Sheets about USMC Trade Agreement
- Jun. 2, 2023
- BRC and Attorneys Ranked in 2023 Chambers Guide
- April 01, 2014
- BRC Partner David Forgue Speaks at ITCC Workshop
- February 5, 2013
-
Detentions, Exclusions, and Customs Protests
By: Lawrence M. Friedman - May-June 2012
-
White House International Trade Initiatives
By: David G. Forgue
Copyright © Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP. All Rights Reserved
Privacy | Terms
Website by FirmWise